Why are Western governments angered by those who compare the military campaigns in Mosul and Aleppo?
|Charred bodies of ISIL fighters suggest abuse|
Over the last weekend of the month of November, Russian military leaders reacted to Western criticism of Russia’s support to the Syrian government to retake eastern Aleppo from armed groups. They countered by accusing the U.S. and its allies of double standard. They suggested, essentially, that what the Syrian government is doing in Aleppo is not any different from what the Iraqi government is doing in Mosul. On Monday November 1, the State Department “slammed Moscow's comparison”, calling it "ludicrous" and "insulting." Curiously, it was actually a Western media outlet, The Independent (see below), from UK, that first made the comparison on October 21, in one of its lead stories, Compare the coverage of Mosul and East Aleppo and it tells you a lot about the propaganda we consume.
Explaining the reasons the U.S. administration felt that such a comparison is insulting, State Department spokesman John Kirby said:
“I mean, in Aleppo you’ve got the regime laying siege to a city with the support of their biggest backer, Russia. In Mosul you have an entire coalition of some 66 nations who have planned for months, so with the vast support and legitimacy of the international community, to retake a city from Daesh over a period of months in support of Iraqi Security Forces.”
It must be noted that, anticipating Western criticism, Russia had suspended its airstrikes on the city of Aleppo weeks before the Syrian government forces and their allies started their operation in east Aleppo. The Russian military insisted that it had halted its airstrikes in early October, “to allow civilians to leave the city through six humanitarian corridors established by the Syrian government.”
Resisting the comparison is purely political as it serves no real purpose in terms of ending the tragedy the Syrian and Iraqi peoples have endured in the last five years. Those who reject the comparison are also behind the selective use of violent armed groups to achieve political goals. There is no doubt that both the Iraqi and Syrian peoples are subjected to horrific conditions, most of which are not of their own doing. Their suffering is the direct outcome of activities by regional and global powers who are using destabilizing these two countries to pursue geopolitical and economic interests.
The comparison is sound, and it should unite all thse countries who claim concern for the Syrian people to focus on ending this crisis. The comparison of the situations in Mosul and Aleppo has merits. Here is why.
Aleppo || Mosul
* Used to be the largest city in Syria || * Used to be the second largest city in Iraq
* Inhabited by predominantly Sunni Muslims || * Inhabited by predominantly Sunni Muslims
* Taken over by predominantly Salafi militants || * Taken over by predominantly Salafi militants
* Being recaptured by government forces and || *Being recaptured by government forces and
allies including, || allies including,
# Syrian military units || # Iraq military units
# Syrian security and police units || # Iraq security and police units
# Shia paramilitary units || # Shia paramilitary units
# Palestinian paramilitary units || # Turkman paramilitary units
# Tribal paramilitary units || # Tribal paramilitary units
# Kurdish paramilitary units || # Kurdish paramilitary units
# Foreign governments’ military units || # Foreign governments’ military units
(authorized by the UN recognized Syrian || (authorized by the UN Iraqi government)
* Nusra and its allied control 225,000 civilians || * ISIL controls 1,200,00 civilians in the city
in the city of Aleppo || of Mosul
* US coalition not authorized by Syrian || * US coalition authorized by the Iraqi government
government || but Russia not authorized by Iraqi government
* Civilians used as human shields by armed group || * Civilians used as human shields by ISIL
* Civilians are killed in the operation || * Civilians are killed in the operation
* All sides might have violated international laws || * All sides might have violated international laws
governing armed conflicts || governing armed conflicts
The only difference between the Iraqi and Syrian situations is that, while there is a consensus among most world governments to support the Iraqi government retake its cities from terrorists, a handful of governments including current U.S. administration, the French government, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, have committed themselves to overthrowing Bashar Assad by any means necessary, including the use of al-Qaeda derivatives to achieve that main objective. It is this political goal, and nothing else, that is prolonging the carnage in Syria, which is, now, having some affect on neighboring countries.
Headlines reacting to comparing Mosul to Aleppo: