Sunday, February 24, 2013

What does Iran want from the P5+1?

And what do the P5+1 want from Iran?

by Ahmed E. Souaiaia*
Iran and the P5+1 group (United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany) are to resume negotiations in Almaty, Kazakhstan on February 26. Their last meeting was eight-month ago in Moscow. That meeting did not produce a breakthrough and that was expected because, in part, the U.S. was not prepared to offer anything of significance at a time when the president was facing re-election. With Obama re-elected and a new national security team being put in place, both sides must feel that they can make some progress. Otherwise there would be no reason to try again. That much was signaled by the new Secretary of State John Kerry who encouraged Iran two days ago (on Friday) to make a serious offer and promised that “the international community is ready to respond”. So what can Iran offer? Or more importantly, what can’t Iran offer?

Here are some of the key points upon which Iran appears to be unwilling to compromise:

1. Iran’s right to nuclear enrichment: Iran says that, before any agreement can be reached, the P5+1 must formally recognize Iran’s right to develop nuclear energy and to enrich uranium under the framework of the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty).

2. Serious offers only: Iran wants the P5+1 to make only credible offers in return for Iran’s reassurances that the nuclear program remains peaceful and any actions that it may take towards that goal. Specifically, Iran finds the offer of spare parts for its aging Boeing airplanes in return for the suspension of uranium enrichment to be insulting.

3. No threats: Iran wants the U.S. and E.U. to rescind the unilateral sanctions they imposed on key Iranian products and institutions. Iran argues that Western states may refuse to deal with Iran if they choose to do so, but they cannot punish other countries for having trade relations with Iran.
From the point of view of Iranian leadership, these three points appear to be the foundation for any agreement. It appears that all previous meetings have come to a halt because these points were not satisfactorily addressed in the eyes of the Iranian leaders.

The P5+1 have gone to these meetings with two goals in mind:

1. Nuclear Technology: The P5+1 seem interested in denying Iran the capacity and capability to domestically enrich any amount of uranium to any level.

2. Nuclear material: The P5+1 want Iran to remove almost all nuclear materials out of the country and import all enriched uranium and nuclear fuel it needs instead.

These are the broad goals for each side of these diplomatic negotiations. But both parties have brought forth other issues. With the rise in sectarian strife in the region and increased instability in the Middle East, both sides hinted at broadening the negotiations to include other matters of common interest. But those issues are no more than useful enticement tools. The nuclear standoff remains the single most important issue for Western countries and for Iran at the same time.

Most read (all time)

Find related articles...

Archived articles (All; by month/year)

Tagged articles...

academic freedom academic integrity Activism Afghanistan Africa Ahmed E. Souaiaia Algeria Anti-Islam film Arab Awakening Arab Spring Arab World Armenia Arms control Australia Bahrain Bawono Kumoro Brazil BRICS Britain Bulgaria Canada Capitalism China Civil Society Conflict Conflicts Constitutions Daesh Democracy Democracy in the Arab World Dignity Diplomacy Dissent Economic develpment economic sanctions Economy education Egypt Egyptian Constitution elections Elections in the Middle East and North Africa Ennahda Erdoğan Europe France Gaza GCC Geneva 1 Geneva 2 Geneva 3 Genevieve Theodorakis Germany Ghannouchi global security Global South Greed HDP Heiko Wimmen Henelito A. Sevilla Henelito A. Sevilla Jr. Houla Human Rights India Indonesia International Affairs International Law International Relations Iowa Iran Iran-US relations Iraq ISIL Islam and Democracy Islam and Europe Islam and the West Islam in America Islam in the Public Sphere Islamic art Islamic cultures Islamic Societies Islamic studies Islamic World Islamism Italy Jabhat al-Nusra Jacob Havel Japan Jared Ethan Krauss JCPOA John B. Quigley Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Jordan Journalism Kobane Kurdistan Kuwait Labor law law and order Lebanon Legitimacy Libya Malaysia Mali Marco Di Lauro media Middle East Middle Eastern Studies migration Military military affairs Mohamed Morsi Mohammed al-Qaisi Morocco Morsi Music Muslim Brethren Muslim Brotherhood Nahda NAM National Coalition Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces North Africa Noureddine Jebnoun Nowrūz Nuclear nuclear technology Obama Occupy Wall Street Organization of the Islamic Cooperation OWS Pakistan Palestine peoples' diplomacy Philosophy Politics proliferation Putin Qatar Raas al-Ayn racism Rana Jawad rebellion Religion and Politics Religion and social policy Religious Freedom Resolution 2254 Rooh-ul-Amin Rouhani Russia Salafism Sarah El-Richani Saudi Arabia Science Shia Soccer social change Souaiaia South Africa Spain Sumeyye Pakdil Syria Takfiris terrorism The Arab Spring in a Global Context the Netherlands the United States The West Tunisia Turkey U.N. U.S. Elections U.S. Foreign Policy U.S. Middle East Policy U.S. Politics UAE UK United Nations University of Iowa US Foreign Policy USA Vienna Talks Wahhabism Wall Street Protestors War and Peace war crimes Western Sahara Yemen Zakaria Hamad

Copyright © Islamic Societies Review. All rights reserved.