Tunisia’s
transition to representative governance brings hope to Arab Societies
Four days after the fourth anniversary of the spark that ignited
the fury of protests widely known as the Arab Spring, Tunisian voters reminded
the world about what the Arab Spring is supposed to look like. The election of
a new president this week capped four years of hard work that involved
politicians and leaders of civil society institutions. In four years, Tunisians
elected a constituency assembly primarily tasked with forming a transitional
government and writing a new constitution. Those goals, despite many setbacks,
were finally achieved. In the past three months, Tunisian voters elected a
parliament, narrowed the field of presidential candidates (of more than 24
candidates) during a first round of presidential elections, and finally chose Beji
Caid Essebsi, giving him 55% of their vote over the interim president, Mohamed
Mouncef Marzouki.
Without doubt, attempts to explain the outcome and meaning
of the results of these elections are numerous. Some commentators described the
outcome as “buyer’s remorse,” suggesting that the Arab peoples are having
second thoughts about the uprisings that overthrew many of the most authoritarian,
yet effective, rulers in the region. Other observers contended that the vote in
Tunisia, like the one in Egypt, which brought al-Sisi to power, is repudiation
to Islamists. Other analysts charged that outside money and influence is behind
the counter-revolutionary movements that are repackaging old regimes in order
to slow down or undo the radical changes the Arab Spring had set in motion.
Indeed, there is some truth in all of these and other theories. However, the
constitution that the Tunisian people approved and the process by which they
transitioned towards representative governance are remarkably impressive and
Tunisians, from all spectrum of social and political life, should celebrate
with pride and relief.
Generally, Tunisians have succeeded in keeping outside
influence to a minimum. They trusted civil society institutions with mediating
political dissent. They supported the interim government in its efforts to isolate
violent elements who want to impose their genocidal agenda. In the end, thanks
to the people’s sacrifices and commitment to non-violence, Tunisia emerged
victorious in many areas. It stands proudly free from the Gulf States’ money-driven
half-solutions that stalled progress in Yemen. Tunisians avoided the power grab
and political opportunism like the ones that took place in Egypt. And above all, Tunisians succeeded in deliberately silencing
the genocidal groups who use knives and guns to slaughter their way to power as
is the case in Libya and Syria.
Tunisians reaffirmed their commitment to the
initial cry for dignity.
Importantly, Tunisians have reminded those who claim sole
ownership of the revolution for themselves that the uprising was not about
replacing one authoritarian regime with another or rewarding a political party
over another. By voting for Nida Tunis (and its leader), which has roots in the
old bureaucracy, and offering Ennahdha a significant number of seats in the new
parliament, Tunisian voters seem to declare that they hold no indiscriminate
prejudice against all and anyone who worked or might have worked with or for
the old regime. They simply have a problem with incompetence, corruption,
cronyism, and abuse of human dignity.
Today, Nida Tunis, the coalition of political parties and
civil society entities’ representative that was created as a counterweight to
the post-revolution ruling collation, is celebrating; just as did Ennahdha and its allies three years ago. Nida Tunis and its
allies should remember that the people, now, have a say in who governs and for
how long. More importantly, they should remain mindful not only of the interest
of the 55% of the people who voted for them, but also of the concerns
of the 45% of Tunisians who voted for Marzouki and the 66% (3.5 million
people) of all registered voters who did not vote at all or voted for Marzouki—not
for their candidate, Essabsi. Regardless, the 36% of the all registered voters who
actually voted for him did not nostalgically vote to bring back the neo-Bourguibists,
they voted out those who failed, in their judgment, to govern… again.
The world community should do more than congratulate the
Tunisian people and their newly elected officials. They should support them
economically, politically, and morally without any strings attached. Indeed,
the Tunisian model for transitioning towards representative governance is the
most convincing rebuttal to genocidal groups who believe in nothing but their
own narrow worldview and tolerate none but themselves.
____________
* Prof. SOUAIAIA teaches at the University of Iowa. His
most recent book, Anatomy of Dissent in Islamic Societies, provides a historical and theoretical
treatment of rebellious movements and ideas since the rise of Islam. Opinions
are the author’s, speaking on matters of public interest; not speaking for the
university or any other organization with which he is affiliated.
No comments:
Write commentsShare your thoughts...